> > @@ -544,7 +545,8 @@ static int negotiate_nvsp_ver(struct hv_device
> > *device,
> > init_packet->msg.v2_msg.send_ndis_config.capability.ieee8021q = 1;
> >
> > if (nvsp_ver >= NVSP_PROTOCOL_VERSION_5) {
> > - init_packet->msg.v2_msg.send_ndis_config.capability.sriov =
> > 1;
> > + if (!hv_is_isolation_supported())
> > + init_packet-
> > >msg.v2_msg.send_ndis_config.capability.sriov = 1;
>
> Please also add a log there stating we don't support sriov in this case.
> Otherwise,
> customers will ask why vf not showing up.
IIUC, you're suggesting that I append something like:
+ else
+ netdev_info(ndev, "SR-IOV not advertised: isolation
supported\n");
I've added this locally; please let me know if you had something else
/better in mind.
> > @@ -563,6 +565,13 @@ static int negotiate_nvsp_ver(struct hv_device
> > *device,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool nvsp_is_valid_version(u32 version)
> > +{
> > + if (hv_is_isolation_supported())
> > + return version >= NVSP_PROTOCOL_VERSION_61;
> > + return true;
> Hosts support isolation should run nvsp 6.1+. This error is not expected.
> Instead of fail silently, we should log an error to explain why it's failed,
> and the current version and expected version.
Please see my next comment below.
> > +}
> > +
> > static int netvsc_connect_vsp(struct hv_device *device,
> > struct netvsc_device *net_device,
> > const struct netvsc_device_info *device_info)
> > @@ -579,12 +588,17 @@ static int netvsc_connect_vsp(struct hv_device
> > *device,
> > init_packet = &net_device->channel_init_pkt;
> >
> > /* Negotiate the latest NVSP protocol supported */
> > - for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(ver_list) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> > + for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(ver_list) - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > + if (!nvsp_is_valid_version(ver_list[i])) {
> > + ret = -EPROTO;
> > + goto cleanup;
> > + }
>
> This code can catch the invalid, but cannot get the current host nvsp version.
> I'd suggest move this check after version negotiation is done. So we can log
> what's
> the current host nvsp version, and why we fail it (the expected nvsp ver).
Mmh, invalid versions are not negotiated. How about I simply add the
following logging right before the above 'ret = -EPROTO' say?
+ netdev_err(ndev, "Invalid NVSP version %x (expected >=
%x): isolation supported\n",
+ ver_list[i], NVSP_PROTOCOL_VERSION_61);
(or something along these lines)
> > @@ -1357,7 +1371,8 @@ static void netvsc_receive_inband(struct
> > net_device *ndev,
> > break;
> >
> > case NVSP_MSG4_TYPE_SEND_VF_ASSOCIATION:
> > - netvsc_send_vf(ndev, nvmsg, msglen);
> > + if (!hv_is_isolation_supported())
> > + netvsc_send_vf(ndev, nvmsg, msglen);
>
> When the driver doesn't advertise SRIOV, this message is not expected.
> Instead of ignore silently, we should log an error.
I've appended:
+ else
+ netdev_err(ndev, "Unexpected VF message: isolation
supported\n");
Please let me know if I got this wrong.
Thanks,
Andrea
