In the case of a socket which is already bound to an adress
there is no sense to create a path in the next attempts

here is a program that shows the issue:

int main()
{
    int s;
    struct sockaddr_un a;

    s = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
    if (s<0)
        perror("socket() failed\n");

    printf("First bind()\n");

    memset(&a, 0, sizeof(a));
    a.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
    strncpy(a.sun_path, "/tmp/.first_bind", sizeof(a.sun_path));

    if ((bind(s, (const struct sockaddr*) &a, sizeof(a))) == -1)
        perror("bind() failed\n");

    printf("Second bind()\n");

    memset(&a, 0, sizeof(a));
    a.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
    strncpy(a.sun_path, "/tmp/.first_bind_failed", sizeof(a.sun_path));

    if ((bind(s, (const struct sockaddr*) &a, sizeof(a))) == -1)
        perror("bind() failed\n");
}

kda@SLES15-SP2:~> ./test
First bind()
Second bind()
bind() failed
: Invalid argument

kda@SLES15-SP2:~> ls -la /tmp/.first_bind
.first_bind         .first_bind_failed

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <k...@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 41c3303c3357..d8b1cfd872a3 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1091,8 +1091,23 @@ static int unix_bind(struct socket *sock, struct 
sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
 out_up:
        mutex_unlock(&u->bindlock);
 out_put:
-       if (err)
+       if (err) {
+               struct path parent = { };
+               struct dentry *dentry;
+               int ret;
+
+               dentry = kern_path_locked(sun_path, &parent);
+               if (IS_ERR(dentry))
+                       return PTR_ERR(dentry);
+
+               ret = vfs_unlink(d_inode(parent.dentry), path.dentry, NULL);
+               if (ret)
+                       err = ret;
+               dput(path.dentry);
+               inode_unlock(d_inode(parent.dentry));
+               path_put(&parent);
                path_put(&path);
+       }
 out:
        return err;
 }
-- 
2.16.4

Reply via email to