On 2021-01-18 11:57, Brendan Jackman wrote:
I actually deliberately skipped this file, thinking that people were
unlikely to want to add assembly-based atomics code under samples/
I guess it's nice for people to be able to e.g. move/copy code from
the selftests.
Yes, that, and the fact that one sample broke w/o the BPF_ATOMIC_OP.
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 at 10:18, Björn Töpel <bjorn.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.to...@intel.com>
Brendan Jackman added extend atomic operations to the BPF instruction
set in commit 7064a7341a0d ("Merge branch 'Atomics for eBPF'"), which
introduces the BPF_ATOMIC_OP macro. However, that macro was missing
for the BPF samples. Fix that by adding it into bpf_insn.h.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.to...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackm...@google.com>
Thanks!
Björn
