On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:41 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It seems unlikely that a system uses both, the parallel *and* the SPI
> >> variant of the ks8851.  So the additional memory necessary because of
> >> code duplication wouldn't matter in practice.
> >
> > I have a board with both options populated on my desk, sorry.
>
> Making the common part a separate module shouldn't be that hard.
> AFAICS it would just take:
> - export 4 functions from common
> - extend Kconfig
> - extend Makefile
> One similar configuration that comes to my mind and could be used as
> template is SPI_FSL_LIB.

There is no need to even change Kconfig, just simplify the Makefile to

obj-$(CONFIG_KS8851) += ks8851_common.o ks8851_spi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KS8851_MLL) += ks8851_common.o ks8851_par.o

This will do the right thing and build ks8851_common.ko into
vmlinux if at least one of the two front-ends is built-in, and
otherwise build it at a loadable module if there is another
module using it.

         Arnd

Reply via email to