> W/o knowing the exact issue in detail: For the sake of bisectability, > shouldn't patches 4 and a modified patch 3 be first? After patches 1 > and 2 we may be in trouble, right?
Thank you very much for the quick reply. You are right, this would be a better way to split the changes. I will do as you suggest and resubmit on Monday. > > And it seems you composed the mails manually: > - subject is prefixed with "Subject:" > - patch subjects in the cover letter don't match the ones of the > respective patches > My bad, I did copy-paste the output of git into the email client and this slipped through - I will be more careful in the future. Sorry about this. > For the patch prefixes: Please add a space between net: and phy: Will do, thank you for pointing this out. Best regards Laurent ----------------------------- Eaton Industries Manufacturing GmbH ~ Registered place of business: Route de la Longeraie 7, 1110, Morges, Switzerland -----------------------------
