On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:38 AM Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:38:22 -0800 Cong Wang wrote: > > From: Cong Wang <cong.w...@bytedance.com> > > > > fl_set_enc_opt() simply checks if there are still bytes left to parse, > > but this is not sufficent as syzbot seems to be able to generate > > malformatted netlink messages. nla_ok() is more strict so should be > > used to validate the next nlattr here. > > > > And nla_validate_nested_deprecated() has less strict check too, it is > > probably too late to switch to the strict version, but we can just > > call nla_ok() too after it. > > > > Reported-and-tested-by: > > syzbot+2624e3778b18fc497...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Fixes: 0a6e77784f49 ("net/sched: allow flower to match tunnel options") > > Fixes: 79b1011cb33d ("net: sched: allow flower to match erspan options") > > > @@ -1340,9 +1341,6 @@ static int fl_set_enc_opt(struct nlattr **tb, struct > > fl_flow_key *key, > > NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Key and mask miss > > aligned"); > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > - > > - if (msk_depth) > > - nla_opt_msk = nla_next(nla_opt_msk, > > &msk_depth); > > break; > > case TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPTS_ERSPAN: > > if (key->enc_opts.dst_opt_type) { > > @@ -1373,14 +1371,17 @@ static int fl_set_enc_opt(struct nlattr **tb, > > struct fl_flow_key *key, > > NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Key and mask miss > > aligned"); > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > - > > - if (msk_depth) > > - nla_opt_msk = nla_next(nla_opt_msk, > > &msk_depth); > > break; > > default: > > NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unknown tunnel option type"); > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > + > > + if (!nla_ok(nla_opt_msk, msk_depth)) { > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Mask attribute is invalid"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + nla_opt_msk = nla_next(nla_opt_msk, &msk_depth); > > we lost the if (msk_depth) now, nla_opt_msk may be NULL - > neither nla_ok() nor nla_next() take NULL
How is "if (msk_depth)" lost when nla_ok() has a stricter one? 1156 static inline int nla_ok(const struct nlattr *nla, int remaining) 1157 { 1158 return remaining >= (int) sizeof(*nla) && 1159 nla->nla_len >= sizeof(*nla) && 1160 nla->nla_len <= remaining; 1161 } Line 1156 assures msk_depth is not only non-zero but also larger than the nla struct size, and clearly nla won't be dereferenced unless this check is passed. I guess you mean we should not error out for nla_opt_msk==NULL case as masks are optional? Thanks.