Hello! (See comment below)

On Monday 11 January 2021 06:00:44 Marek Behún wrote:
> This adds support for multigig copper SFP modules from RollBall/Hilink.
> These modules have a specific way to access clause 45 registers of the
> internal PHY.
> 
> We also need to wait at least 22 seconds after deasserting TX disable
> before accessing the PHY. The code waits for 25 seconds just to be sure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <ka...@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> index 0621d12cf878..21fb96899518 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ static const enum gpiod_flags gpio_flags[] = {
>   * on board (for a copper SFP) time to initialise.
>   */
>  #define T_WAIT                       msecs_to_jiffies(50)
> +#define T_WAIT_ROLLBALL              msecs_to_jiffies(25000)
>  #define T_START_UP           msecs_to_jiffies(300)
>  #define T_START_UP_BAD_GPON  msecs_to_jiffies(60000)
>  
> @@ -204,8 +205,11 @@ static const enum gpiod_flags gpio_flags[] = {
>  
>  /* SFP modules appear to always have their PHY configured for bus address
>   * 0x56 (which with mdio-i2c, translates to a PHY address of 22).
> + * RollBall SFPs access phy via SFP Enhanced Digital Diagnostic Interface
> + * via address 0x51 (mdio-i2c will use RollBall protocol on this address).
>   */
> -#define SFP_PHY_ADDR 22
> +#define SFP_PHY_ADDR         22
> +#define SFP_PHY_ADDR_ROLLBALL        17
>  
>  struct sff_data {
>       unsigned int gpios;
> @@ -218,6 +222,7 @@ struct sfp {
>       struct mii_bus *i2c_mii;
>       struct sfp_bus *sfp_bus;
>       enum mdio_i2c_proto mdio_protocol;
> +     int phy_addr;
>       struct phy_device *mod_phy;
>       const struct sff_data *type;
>       size_t i2c_block_size;
> @@ -250,6 +255,7 @@ struct sfp {
>       struct sfp_eeprom_id id;
>       unsigned int module_power_mW;
>       unsigned int module_t_start_up;
> +     unsigned int module_t_wait;
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWMON)
>       struct sfp_diag diag;
> @@ -1453,7 +1459,7 @@ static int sfp_sm_probe_phy(struct sfp *sfp, bool 
> is_c45)
>       struct phy_device *phy;
>       int err;
>  
> -     phy = get_phy_device(sfp->i2c_mii, SFP_PHY_ADDR, is_c45);
> +     phy = get_phy_device(sfp->i2c_mii, sfp->phy_addr, is_c45);
>       if (phy == ERR_PTR(-ENODEV))
>               return PTR_ERR(phy);
>       if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> @@ -1835,6 +1841,23 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp, bool 
> report)
>  
>       sfp->mdio_protocol = MDIO_I2C_DEFAULT;
>  
> +     sfp->phy_addr = SFP_PHY_ADDR;
> +     sfp->module_t_wait = T_WAIT;
> +
> +     if (((!memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "OEM             ", 16) ||
> +           !memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "Turris          ", 16)) &&
> +          (!memcmp(id.base.vendor_pn, "SFP-10G-T       ", 16) ||
> +           !memcmp(id.base.vendor_pn, "RTSFP-10", 8)))) {
> +             sfp->mdio_protocol = MDIO_I2C_ROLLBALL;
> +             sfp->phy_addr = SFP_PHY_ADDR_ROLLBALL;
> +             sfp->module_t_wait = T_WAIT_ROLLBALL;
> +
> +             /* RollBall SFPs may have wrong (zero) extended compliacne code
> +              * burned in EEPROM. For PHY probing we need the correct one.
> +              */
> +             id.base.extended_cc = SFF8024_ECC_10GBASE_T_SFI;

Should not we rather in sfp_sm_probe_for_phy() function in "default"
section try to probe also for clause 45 PHY when clause 22 fails?

> +     }
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2030,9 +2053,10 @@ static void sfp_sm_main(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int 
> event)
>  
>               /* We need to check the TX_FAULT state, which is not defined
>                * while TX_DISABLE is asserted. The earliest we want to do
> -              * anything (such as probe for a PHY) is 50ms.
> +              * anything (such as probe for a PHY) is 50ms. (or more on
> +              * specific modules).
>                */
> -             sfp_sm_next(sfp, SFP_S_WAIT, T_WAIT);
> +             sfp_sm_next(sfp, SFP_S_WAIT, sfp->module_t_wait);
>               break;
>  
>       case SFP_S_WAIT:
> @@ -2046,8 +2070,8 @@ static void sfp_sm_main(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int 
> event)
>                        * deasserting.
>                        */
>                       timeout = sfp->module_t_start_up;
> -                     if (timeout > T_WAIT)
> -                             timeout -= T_WAIT;
> +                     if (timeout > sfp->module_t_wait)
> +                             timeout -= sfp->module_t_wait;
>                       else
>                               timeout = 1;
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

Reply via email to