From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:07:00 +0200
> After sending this patch I was a little confused, when next > lockdep warning report appeared, and I thought - since this is > not enough, this patch could be dumped. But now I changed my > mind: there are really many possibilities of strange connections > between locks taken from vlans, ppp (with pppoe), multicasts etc. > - that every one possibility less is a gain here. ... > Of course, later, if somebody will find better solution, they could > be removed, I already suggested a better fix, you ignored it. For each unique netdev type, use a different locking class. That will fix this forever, anything else is a situation specific band-aid (but then again isn't that what every lockdep annotation is :-). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
