On 1/6/2021 5:45 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 08:58:50PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: >> This is marked as Request For Comments for a reason. > > If nobody has any objections, I will remove the memory leaks I > introduced to check if anybody is paying attention, and I will resubmit > this as a non-RFC series. > I read through this, and it makes sense to me. I admit that I still don't grasp all the details of the locking involved. Thanks, Jake
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 09/12] net: net_failover: ensure .n... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 08/12] net: make dev_get_stats retu... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 05/12] s390/appldata_net_sum: hold ... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net: remove obsolete comment... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 04/12] net: sysfs: don't hold dev_b... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 07/12] parisc/led: hold the netdev ... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 02/12] net: introduce a mutex for t... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 06/12] parisc/led: reindent the cod... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 03/12] net: procfs: hold netif_list... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 00/12] Make .ndo_get_stats64 sl... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 00/12] Make .ndo_get_stats... Jacob Keller