On 1/6/21 11:44 AM, David Howells wrote: > Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> These two loops iterate over the same data, i believe returning here is all >> that is needed. > But if the first loop is made to support a new type, but the second loop is > missed, it will then likely oops. Besides, the compiler should optimise both > paths together.
You are right, I was only considering the existing cases. Tom > David >
