Krishna Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doing some measurements, I found that for small packets like 128 bytes, > the bandwidth is approximately 60% of the line speed. To possibly speed > up performance of small packet xmits, a method of "linking" skbs was > thought of - where two pointers (skb_flink/blink) is added to the skb.
You don't need that. You can just use the normal next/prev pointers. In general it's a good idea to lower lock overhead etc., the VM has used similar tricks very successfully in the past. There were some thoughts about this earlier, but in highend NICs the direction instead seems to go towards LRO (large receive offloading). LRO is basically like TSO, just for receiving. The NIC aggregates multiple packets into a single larger one that is then processed by the stack as one skb. This typically doesn't use linked lists, but an array of pages. Your scheme would help old NICs that don't have this optimization. Might be a worth goal, although people often seem to be more interested in modern hardware. Another problem is that this setup typically requires the aggregate packets to be from the same connection. Otherwise you will only safe a short trip into the stack until the linked packet would need to be split again to pass to multiple sockets. With that the scheme probably helps much less. The hardware schemes typically use at least some kind of hash to aggregiate connections You might need to implement something similar too if it doesn't save enough time. Don't know if it would be very efficient in software. Or you could do this only if multiple packets belong to the same single connection (basically with a one hit cache); but then it would smell a bit like a benchmark hack. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
