On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 09:58 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > > Good, we agree on this.
Good start. > Now let's solve the problem. > Lets take it slowly, because i think i wasnt getting anywhere with Peter. See if you make sense of what i am saying maybe we can make progress. > When the low priority ring buffer is full in the hardware, will you > suppose the driver call netif_stop_queue() or not? Yes, I will. With a note: This is precisely what i have been saying all along in my posting. I explained my reasoning; if you missed the why I think i should write it up. So in order to make progress - i am going to not respond to the rest of the email; tell me if you dont understand me and i will do a write up hopefully tommorow or over the weekend. Or tell me you understand me and disagree because of .... cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
