Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu....@canonical.com> wrote: > When running this xfrm_policy.sh test script, even with some cases > marked as FAIL, the overall test result will still be PASS: > > $ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh > PASS: policy before exception matches > FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions) > PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions) > PASS: policy matches (exceptions) > FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies) > PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies) > PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies) > FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after > hresh changes) > PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh > changes) > PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) > FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after > hthresh change in ns3) > PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh > change in ns3) > PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in > ns3) > FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after > htresh change to normal) > PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh > change to normal) > PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to > normal) > PASS: policies with repeated htresh change > $ echo $? > 0 > > This is because the $lret in check_xfrm() is not a local variable.
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
