On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 23:52 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:18:04AM -0400, jamal wrote: > > > > I wonder how much performance improvement this give now that the extra > > incursion into qdisc_restart is avoided. > > Probably very little since the only way it can make a difference is if > there is lots of contention. But if there is lots of contention we > should stay in the function anyway.
Less to do with CPU contention and more with Krishna's change which avoids entering that region all together which is useful even in the absence of contention. In the past (based on some measurement i did) upto 50% of the executions of qdisc restart were on an empty queue depending on traffic rates. BTW, given that i couldnt recall the layout of the locks on qdisc restart; I think i will come back with the old patch i had to clean up the readability of qdisc restart so it is easy to tell just by quick inspection. Since Canada seems to be comfortably taking revenge on the Swiss (my condolonces to Thomas and Ratz) - i think it is time for me to head out ;-> ttl. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
