Hi all,

On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:22:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> 
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   91b2db27d3ff ("bpf: Simplify task_file_seq_get_next()")
> 
> from the bpf-next tree and commit:
> 
>   edc52f17257a ("bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use 
> task_lookup_next_fd_rcu")
> 
> from the userns tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think, see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> index 0458a40edf10,4ec63170c741..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> @@@ -136,41 -135,29 +135,30 @@@ struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info 
>   };
>   
>   static struct file *
>  -task_file_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info,
>  -                   struct task_struct **task)
>  +task_file_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info)
>   {
>       struct pid_namespace *ns = info->common.ns;
> -     u32 curr_tid = info->tid, max_fds;
> -     struct files_struct *curr_files;
> +     u32 curr_tid = info->tid;
>       struct task_struct *curr_task;
> -     int curr_fd = info->fd;
> +     unsigned int curr_fd = info->fd;
>   
>       /* If this function returns a non-NULL file object,
> -      * it held a reference to the task/files_struct/file.
> +      * it held a reference to the task/file.
>        * Otherwise, it does not hold any reference.
>        */
>   again:
>  -    if (*task) {
>  -            curr_task = *task;
>  +    if (info->task) {
>  +            curr_task = info->task;
> -             curr_files = info->files;
>               curr_fd = info->fd;
>       } else {
>               curr_task = task_seq_get_next(ns, &curr_tid, true);
>  -            if (!curr_task)
>  +            if (!curr_task) {
>  +                    info->task = NULL;
> -                     info->files = NULL;
>                       return NULL;
>  +            }
>   
> -             curr_files = get_files_struct(curr_task);
> -             if (!curr_files) {
> -                     put_task_struct(curr_task);
> -                     curr_tid = ++(info->tid);
> -                     info->fd = 0;
> -                     goto again;
> -             }
> - 
> -             info->files = curr_files;
> +             /* set *task and info->tid */
>  -            *task = curr_task;
>  +            info->task = curr_task;
>               if (curr_tid == info->tid) {
>                       curr_fd = info->fd;
>               } else {
> @@@ -198,10 -183,8 +184,8 @@@
>   
>       /* the current task is done, go to the next task */
>       rcu_read_unlock();
> -     put_files_struct(curr_files);
>       put_task_struct(curr_task);
>  -    *task = NULL;
>  +    info->task = NULL;
> -     info->files = NULL;
>       info->fd = 0;
>       curr_tid = ++(info->tid);
>       goto again;
> @@@ -210,13 -193,18 +194,12 @@@
>   static void *task_file_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
>   {
>       struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info = seq->private;
>  -    struct task_struct *task = NULL;
>       struct file *file;
>   
>  -    file = task_file_seq_get_next(info, &task);
>  -    if (!file) {
>  -            info->task = NULL;
>  -            return NULL;
>  -    }
>  -
>  -    if (*pos == 0)
>  +    info->task = NULL;
> -     info->files = NULL;
>  +    file = task_file_seq_get_next(info);
>  +    if (file && *pos == 0)
>               ++*pos;
>  -    info->task = task;
>   
>       return file;
>   }

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.  Commit 91b2db27d3ff
is now in the net-next tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpabZGugATPZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to