On 12/8/20 10:45 AM, SeongJae Park wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sjp...@amazon.de>
> 
> In 'fqdir_exit()', a work for destruction of the 'fqdir' is enqueued.
> The work function, 'fqdir_work_fn()', calls 'rcu_barrier()'.  In case of
> intensive 'fqdir_exit()' (e.g., frequent 'unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)'
> systemcalls), this increased contention could result in unacceptably
> high latency of 'rcu_barrier()'.  This commit avoids such contention by
> doing the destruction in batched manner, as similar to that of
> 'cleanup_net()'.

Any numbers to share ? I have never seen an issue.

> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjp...@amazon.de>
> ---
>  include/net/inet_frag.h  |  2 +-
>  net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/inet_frag.h b/include/net/inet_frag.h
> index bac79e817776..558893d8810c 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet_frag.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet_frag.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct fqdir {
>  
>       /* Keep atomic mem on separate cachelines in structs that include it */
>       atomic_long_t           mem ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> -     struct work_struct      destroy_work;
> +     struct llist_node       destroy_list;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> index 10d31733297d..796b559137c5 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> @@ -145,12 +145,19 @@ static void inet_frags_free_cb(void *ptr, void *arg)
>               inet_frag_destroy(fq);
>  }
>  
> +static LLIST_HEAD(destroy_list);
> +
>  static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> -     struct fqdir *fqdir = container_of(work, struct fqdir, destroy_work);
> -     struct inet_frags *f = fqdir->f;
> +     struct llist_node *kill_list;
> +     struct fqdir *fqdir;
> +     struct inet_frags *f;
> +
> +     /* Atomically snapshot the list of fqdirs to destroy */
> +     kill_list = llist_del_all(&destroy_list);
>  
> -     rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, 
> NULL);
> +     llist_for_each_entry(fqdir, kill_list, destroy_list)
> +             rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, 
> inet_frags_free_cb, NULL);
> 


OK, it seems rhashtable_free_and_destroy() has cond_resched() so we are not 
going
to hold this cpu for long periods.
 
>       /* We need to make sure all ongoing call_rcu(..., inet_frag_destroy_rcu)
>        * have completed, since they need to dereference fqdir.
> @@ -158,10 +165,13 @@ static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>        */
>       rcu_barrier();
>  
> -     if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
> -             complete(&f->completion);
> +     llist_for_each_entry(fqdir, kill_list, destroy_list) {

Don't we need the llist_for_each_entry_safe() variant here ???

> +             f = fqdir->f;
> +             if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
> +                     complete(&f->completion);
>  
> -     kfree(fqdir);
> +             kfree(fqdir);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  int fqdir_init(struct fqdir **fqdirp, struct inet_frags *f, struct net *net)
> @@ -184,10 +194,12 @@ int fqdir_init(struct fqdir **fqdirp, struct inet_frags 
> *f, struct net *net)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(fqdir_init);
>  
> +static DECLARE_WORK(fqdir_destroy_work, fqdir_work_fn);
> +
>  void fqdir_exit(struct fqdir *fqdir)
>  {
> -     INIT_WORK(&fqdir->destroy_work, fqdir_work_fn);
> -     queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
> +     if (llist_add(&fqdir->destroy_list, &destroy_list))
> +             queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir_destroy_work);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(fqdir_exit);
>  
> 

Reply via email to