On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 23:31:44 -0300 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:00:32PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:40:49 -0300 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > By setting NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER. Otherwise, the updates added by
> > > commit ef803b3cf96a ("netfilter: flowtable: add counter support in HW
> > > offload") are not effective when using act_ct.
> > >
> > > While at it, now that we have the flag set, protect the call to
> > > nf_ct_acct_update() by commit beb97d3a3192 ("net/sched: act_ct: update
> > > nf_conn_acct for act_ct SW offload in flowtable") with the check on
> > > NF_FLOWTABLE_COUNTER, as also done on other places.
> > >
> > > Note that this shouldn't impact performance as these stats are only
> > > enabled when net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_acct is enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com>
> >
> > Why no Fixes tag and not targeting net here?
>
> Well, I don't know if it was left out on purpose or not/missed.
> What I know is that act_ct initially had no support for stats of
> offloaded entries. ef803b3cf96a wasn't specific to act_ct (and didn't
> have to update it), while some support on act_ct was introduced with
> beb97d3a3192, but only for sw offload. So it seems to me that it's
> just a new piece(/incremental development) that nobody had cared so
> far.
>
> If you see it otherwise, I'm happy to change. I'll just need a hint on
> which commit I should use for the Fixes tag (as it's not clear to me,
> per above).
I don't know the code well enough to override, so I'll trust your
judgment :)
Applied to net-next, thanks!
