> Either way, can we conclude that ndo_get_stats64 is not a replacement > for ethtool -S, since the latter is blocking and, if implemented correctly, > can return the counters at the time of the call (therefore making sure > that anything that happened before the syscall has been accounted into > the retrieved values), and the former isn't?
ethtool -S is the best source of consistent, up to date statistics we
have. It seems silly not to include everything the hardware offers
there.
Andrew
