Hello Jakub,
On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>> All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
>> dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
>> 5.00a [2].
>>
>> Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
>>
>> Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
>>
>> [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
>> [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.bor...@st.com>
>
> Applied to net-next.
This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
@@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
@@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
change for the correct variant.
Cheers,
Ahmad
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
