From: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> We need to cope with some more state transition for fallback sockets, or could still end-up moving to TCP_CLOSE too early and avoid spooling some pending data
Fixes: e16163b6e2b7 ("mptcp: refactor shutdown and close") Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martin...@linux.intel.com> --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index 749c00fffff5..a46a542b1766 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -777,7 +777,9 @@ static void mptcp_check_for_eof(struct mptcp_sock *msk) inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE_WAIT); break; case TCP_FIN_WAIT1: - /* fallback sockets skip TCP_CLOSING - TCP will take care */ + inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSING); + break; + case TCP_FIN_WAIT2: inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); break; default: @@ -2085,10 +2087,16 @@ static void __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(struct sock *sk) WRITE_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt, msk->write_seq); - /* fallback socket will not get data_fin/ack, can move to close now */ - if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk) && sk->sk_state == TCP_LAST_ACK) { - inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); - mptcp_close_wake_up(sk); + /* fallback socket will not get data_fin/ack, can move to the next + * state now + */ + if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) { + if ((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_CLOSING | TCPF_LAST_ACK)) { + inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); + mptcp_close_wake_up(sk); + } else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_FIN_WAIT1) { + inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_FIN_WAIT2); + } } __mptcp_flush_join_list(msk); -- 2.29.2