On 11/18/20, Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:37:59 +0900 Bongsu Jeon wrote:
>> implement the NCI 2.x initial sequence to support NCI 2.x NFCC.
>> Since NCI 2.0, CORE_RESET and CORE_INIT sequence have been changed.
>> If NFCEE supports NCI 2.x, then NCI 2.x initial sequence will work.
>>
>> In NCI 1.0, Initial sequence and payloads are as below:
>> (DH)                     (NFCC)
>>  |  -- CORE_RESET_CMD --> |
>>  |  <-- CORE_RESET_RSP -- |
>>  |  -- CORE_INIT_CMD -->  |
>>  |  <-- CORE_INIT_RSP --  |
>>  CORE_RESET_RSP payloads are Status, NCI version, Configuration Status.
>>  CORE_INIT_CMD payloads are empty.
>>  CORE_INIT_RSP payloads are Status, NFCC Features,
>>     Number of Supported RF Interfaces, Supported RF Interface,
>>     Max Logical Connections, Max Routing table Size,
>>     Max Control Packet Payload Size, Max Size for Large Parameters,
>>     Manufacturer ID, Manufacturer Specific Information.
>>
>> In NCI 2.0, Initial Sequence and Parameters are as below:
>> (DH)                     (NFCC)
>>  |  -- CORE_RESET_CMD --> |
>>  |  <-- CORE_RESET_RSP -- |
>>  |  <-- CORE_RESET_NTF -- |
>>  |  -- CORE_INIT_CMD -->  |
>>  |  <-- CORE_INIT_RSP --  |
>>  CORE_RESET_RSP payloads are Status.
>>  CORE_RESET_NTF payloads are Reset Trigger,
>>     Configuration Status, NCI Version, Manufacturer ID,
>>     Manufacturer Specific Information Length,
>>     Manufacturer Specific Information.
>>  CORE_INIT_CMD payloads are Feature1, Feature2.
>>  CORE_INIT_RSP payloads are Status, NFCC Features,
>>     Max Logical Connections, Max Routing Table Size,
>>     Max Control Packet Payload Size,
>>     Max Data Packet Payload Size of the Static HCI Connection,
>>     Number of Credits of the Static HCI Connection,
>>     Max NFC-V RF Frame Size, Number of Supported RF Interfaces,
>>     Supported RF Interfaces.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.j...@samsung.com>
>
> Please fix the following sparse (build with C=1) warning:
>
> net/nfc/nci/ntf.c:42:17: warning: cast to restricted __le32
>
>> +    __u8 status = 0;
>
> Please don't use the __u types in the normal kernel code, those are
> types for user space ABI.
>

Thanks for reviewing my patch.
I will change the code to fix it
and then resend my patch with version2.

Reply via email to