Thanks a lot for your response.

However, it is still unclear, since the allocated memory for TCP socket buffers, which I saw via sockstat, shows zero when calling send() after recv() as shown in the previous email.

Do you mean that it is necessary to hold the receive buffer allocation for future packet when calling only recv(), but not necessary when calling send() after recv()?

On the other hand, when a server calls read() and send() for echoing messages 
for all connections, the sockstat shows that all the socket buffers are 
deallocated after competing echoing as follows:

TCP: inuse 13 orphan 0 tw 0 alloc 19 mem 0
TCP: inuse 1237 orphan 0 tw 0 alloc 1243 mem 0
TCP: inuse 2461 orphan 0 tw 0 alloc 2467 mem 0
TCP: inuse 3688 orphan 0 tw 0 alloc 3694 mem 0
TCP: inuse 4912 orphan 0 tw 0 alloc 4918 mem 268
TCP: inuse 5012 orphan 0 tw 0 alloc 5018 mem 101
TCP: inuse 5012 orphan 0 tw 0 alloc 5018 mem 0

Regards,
Kumiko

David Miller wrote:
From: Kumiko Ono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 23:22:36 -0400

Could anybody tell me why the garbage in the memory for TCP socket buffers remains? Is this a problem on deallocation of socket buffers, or just on sockstat? Or I'm missing something?

It is not garbage, it is simply holding on to the receive buffer
allocation in anticipation of future packet receives for that
socket.

The values in the global pool, which you saw via sockstat, are
allocated from on a per-socket basis into a per-socket allocation
quota.  Packets attached to that socket have to take from this
quota.

The idea is that once you get a per-socket allocation, you use
that until you need more.  When you release, you keep the
per-socket allocation unless we are under global memory
pressure.

This prevents having to go to allocate from the global pool
too often which is very expensive especially on SMP since
it is a shared datastructure and requires locking.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to