Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 18:32:43 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit : > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:06:33 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote: > > Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 17:06:52 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit : > > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:05:39 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote: > > > > Le dimanche 15 novembre 2020, 01:18:37 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit : > > > > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:56:26 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! This looks good to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jakub, does this look ready to you? > > > > > > > > > > Yup, looks good, sorry! > > > > > > > > > > But it didn't get into patchwork cleanly :/ > > > > > > > > > > One more resend please? (assuming we're expected to take this > > > > > into net-next) > > > > > > > > I will send it again and tag it for net-next. > > > > > > > > Just to know, is patchwork this: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/ > > > > > > Yes, that's the one. > > > > OK! The tool seems cool. > > > > So normally I resend the patches, but I do not see them in patchwork. > > Is there something am I supposed to do so they can be visible through > > patchwork? > > They were visible, this is your resend: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=384457&state=* > > (note the * at the end, sometimes it gets stripped when clicking on a > link) > > Maybe you checked after I already applied them, patches which had been > "handled" (aka "Action required=no") are not displayed by default.
Working of patchwork is now clearer for me, thank you! But yes I think I checked after you applied them.
