The static checker is fooled by the non-static locking scheme
implemented by the mentioned helpers.
Let's make its life easier adding some unconditional annotation
so that the helpers are now interpreted as a plain spinlock from
sparse.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
---
 include/net/sock.h | 9 ++++++---
 net/core/sock.c    | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 1d29aeae74fd..60d321c6b5a5 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1595,7 +1595,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
                                SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
 #define bh_unlock_sock(__sk)   spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
 
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
+bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+
 /**
  * unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
  * @sk: socket
@@ -1606,10 +1607,12 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
  */
 static inline void unlock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk, bool slow)
 {
-       if (slow)
+       if (slow) {
                release_sock(sk);
-       else
+               __release(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+       } else {
                spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+       }
 }
 
 /* Used by processes to "lock" a socket state, so that
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 727ea1cc633c..9badbe7bb4e4 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);
  *
  *   sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
  */
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
+bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
 {
        might_sleep();
        spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
@@ -3096,6 +3096,7 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
         * The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here:
         */
        mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+       __acquire(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
        local_bh_enable();
        return true;
 }
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to