Hello, ---- On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:55:08 +0100 Hideaki Yoshifuji <hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com> wrote ----
> Hi, > > 2020年11月13日(金) 0:46 Dmytro Shytyi <dmy...@shytyi.net>: > > > > Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO (randomly > > generated hostID or stable privacy + privacy extensions). > > The main problem is that SLAAC RA or PD allocates a /64 by the Wireless > > carrier 4G, 5G to a mobile hotspot, however segmentation of the /64 via > > SLAAC is required so that downstream interfaces can be further subnetted. > > Example: uCPE device (4G + WI-FI enabled) receives /64 via Wireless, and > > assigns /72 to VNF-Firewall, /72 to WIFI, /72 to VNF-Router, /72 to > > Load-Balancer and /72 to wired connected devices. > > IETF document that defines problem statement: > > draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt > > IETF document that specifies variable slaac: > > draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shytyi <dmy...@shytyi.net> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> > > --- > > > - write_lock_bh(&idev->lock); > > + int ret; > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128) > > + __int128 host_id; > > + __int128 net_prfx; > : > > No, this does not help anything. > Please do not rely on __int128. [Dmytro] Understood. Thank you. > --yoshfuji >
