On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:21:18 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 20:35:14 +0100 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > Introduced in 65324144b50b, the "proxy_arp_vlan" sysctl is a
^ pvlan
The sysctl is called "proxy_arp_pvlan"
> > per-interface sysctl to tune proxy ARP support for private VLANs.
> > While the "all" variant is exposed, it was a noop and never evaluated.
> > We use the usual "or" logic for this kind of sysctls.
> >
> > Fixes: 65324144b50b ("net: RFC3069, private VLAN proxy arp support")
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Bernat <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > include/linux/inetdevice.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
> CC Jesper
>
> I know this is 10 year old code, but can we get an ack for applying
> this to net-next?
ACK, I agree that the "all" variant doesn't make sense for proxy_arp_pvlan.
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/inetdevice.h b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
> > index 3bbcddd22df8..53aa0343bf69 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/inetdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
> > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline void ipv4_devconf_setall(struct in_device
> > *in_dev)
> >
> > #define IN_DEV_LOG_MARTIANS(in_dev) IN_DEV_ORCONF((in_dev),
> > LOG_MARTIANS)
> > #define IN_DEV_PROXY_ARP(in_dev) IN_DEV_ORCONF((in_dev), PROXY_ARP)
> > -#define IN_DEV_PROXY_ARP_PVLAN(in_dev) IN_DEV_CONF_GET(in_dev,
> > PROXY_ARP_PVLAN)
> > +#define IN_DEV_PROXY_ARP_PVLAN(in_dev) IN_DEV_ORCONF((in_dev),
> > PROXY_ARP_PVLAN)
> > #define IN_DEV_SHARED_MEDIA(in_dev) IN_DEV_ORCONF((in_dev),
> > SHARED_MEDIA)
> > #define IN_DEV_TX_REDIRECTS(in_dev) IN_DEV_ORCONF((in_dev),
> > SEND_REDIRECTS)
> > #define IN_DEV_SEC_REDIRECTS(in_dev) IN_DEV_ORCONF((in_dev), \
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
