On 11/8/2020 5:19 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> We'll need to start listening to SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE
> events even for interfaces where dsa_slave_dev_check returns false, so
> we need that check inside the switch-case statement for SWITCHDEV_FDB_*.
>
> This movement also avoids two useless allocation / free paths for
> switchdev_work, which were difficult to avoid before, due to the code's
> structure:
> - on the untreated "default event" case.
> - on the case where fdb_info->added_by_user is false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
- [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] Offload learnt bridge addresses... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: dsa: don't use switch... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: dsa: don't us... Vladimir Oltean
- [RFC PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: move switchdev e... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: move swi... Florian Fainelli
- [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: listen for SWITC... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: listen f... DENG Qingfang
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: list... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: ... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: ... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] n... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] n... Tobias Waldekranz
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/... Vladimir Oltean
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/... Tobias Waldekranz
- Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/... Vladimir Oltean
