On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, David Miller wrote: > > > From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:02:47 +0300 (EEST) > > > > > SACKED_ACKED and LOST are mutually exclusive, thus this > > > condition is bug with SACK (IMHO). NewReno, however, could get
[...snip...] > > I've applied this, thanks for your patience. ...heh... I was getting a bit unsure whether you still had them... > I think I sent an updated version later (hopefully I reach you before > you push these out :-)), which made the BUG_ON unconditional (I used it > instead of BUG_TRAP as it seems to be generic machinery for handling > these). Here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117648826715609&w=2 -- i.
