On 6 November 2020 9:34:45 PM IST, Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:43:53 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:57:08PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 18:23:53 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
>> > > This function can be used by client driver to determine whether
>it's
>> > > possible to queue new elements in a channel ring.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poul...@linaro.org>
>> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam
><manivannan.sadhasi...@linaro.org>
>> >
>> > Applied.
>>
>> Oops. I should've mentioned this (my bad) that we should use an
>immutable
>> branch to take this change. Because, there are changes going to get
>merged
>> into the MHI tree which will introduce merge conflicts. And moreover,
>we
>> planned to have an immutable branch to handle a similar case with
>ath11k.
>
>Damn, sorry.
>
>> Since you've applied now, what would you propose?
>
>Do you need mhi_queue_is_full() in other branches, or are you just
>concerned about the conflicts?
>
Yes, I need this patch in mhi-next.
>I'm assuming the concern is just about the mhi/core patch, or would
>you need to refactor something in the net driver as well?
Just the mhi_queue_is_full() patch.
Thanks,
Mani
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
