Andrew Lunn wrote on Sun, Nov 01, 2020: > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Acked-by: Dominique Martinet <asmad...@codewreck.org> > > > > Thanks, LGTM I'll take this for next cycle unless someone is grabbing > > these > > I hope to turn on W=1 by default soon in most of /net. That patch is > likely to go to net-next. That would be nice! > What route do your patches normally take to Linus? Do you send a pull > request to net-next? Or straight to Linus? I normally send pull requests straight to Linus (because I also have fs/9p which isn't part of net/) ; but since it's really low volume I don't like bugging him everytime for such churn and am not really sure what to do -- that's why I asked :) > If this patch is not in net-next, i cannot enable it for 9p. So > either: > [...] > 4) Jakub takes this patch into net-next, and i can then enable W=1 in > 9p along with all the other sub-directories. We will get to know > about new warnings in net-next, and next, but not in your tree. Developers should use next for development anyway; I think that's the easiest way forward if you want to enable W=1 ASAP. I mean, if I take the patch the fixes will get in next in the next few days sure but it'll make enabling W=1 difficult for the net-next tree without it. I've added Jakub to direct recipients, could you take this one? Thanks, -- Dominique
