I have this floating about in my tree. Is it of any interest?
From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My proposal is: maybe Eric could change this in
> > xfrm6_tunnel_rcv() from xfrm6_tunnel.c e.g. like this:
> >
> > return xfrm6_rcv_spi(skb, spi) > 0 ? : 0;
> >
> > and, if no errors in testing, he could resubmit this patch?
>
> I agree, this is the right fix.
The fix proposed by Jarek indeed fixes the problem, tested on two boxes,
with an -rc5 kernel and a yesterdays git
Acked-by: Eric Sesterhenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c~fix-slab-corruption-running-ip6sic
net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c~fix-slab-corruption-running-ip6sic
+++ a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int xfrm6_tunnel_rcv(struct sk_bu
__be32 spi;
spi = xfrm6_tunnel_spi_lookup((xfrm_address_t *)&iph->saddr);
- return xfrm6_rcv_spi(skb, spi);
+ return xfrm6_rcv_spi(skb, spi) > 0 ? : 0;
}
static int xfrm6_tunnel_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
