On 10/25/20 3:43 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:48:16 +0200 Guillaume Nault wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:23:04AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:19:43 +0200 Guillaume Nault wrote: >>>> Since commit b7c24497baea ("mpls: load mpls_gso after mpls_iptunnel"), >>>> mpls_iptunnel.ko has a softdep on mpls_gso.ko. For this to work, we >>>> need to ensure that mpls_gso.ko is built whenever MPLS_IPTUNNEL is set. >>> >>> Does it generate an error or a warning? I don't know much about soft >>> dependencies, but I'd think it's optional. >> >> Yes, it's optional from a softdep point of view. My point was that >> having a softdep isn't a complete solution, as a bad .config can still >> result in inability to properly transmit GSO packets. > > IMO the combination of select and softdep feels pretty strange. > > It's either a softdep and therefore optional, or we really don't > want to be missing it in a correctly functioning system, and the > dependency should be made stronger. >
That's why I liked the softdep solution - if the module is there, load it.