On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:07:44 +0000 David Laight wrote: > FWIW I suspect the 'return -ERR on overflow' is going to bite us. > Code that does p += strsxxx(p, ..., lim - p, ...) assuming (or not > caring) about overflow goes badly wrong.
I don't really care either way, but in netlink there's usually an attribute per value, nothing combines strings like p += strx..(). Looking at the conversion in patch 2 the callers just want to check for overflow.
