Thanks for review and comment, Jakub!
Please check my v2 patch.

Best,
-Ke

On 10/21/20, 8:53 PM, "Jakub Kicinski" <k...@kernel.org> wrote:

    On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:31:49 -0400 Ke Li wrote:
    > In setsockopt(SO_MAX_PACING_RATE) on 64bit systems, sk_max_pacing_rate,
    > after extended from 'u32' to 'unsigned long', takes unintentionally
    > hiked value whenever assigned from an 'int' value with MSB=1, due to
    > binary sign extension in promoting s32 to u64, e.g. 0x80000000 becomes
    > 0xFFFFFFFF80000000.
    > 
    > Thus inflated sk_max_pacing_rate causes subsequent getsockopt to return
    > ~0U unexpectedly. It may also result in increased pacing rate.
    > 
    > Fix by explicitly casting the 'int' value to 'unsigned int' before
    > assigning it to sk_max_pacing_rate, for zero extension to happen.
    > 
    > Fixes: 76a9ebe811fb ("net: extend sk_pacing_rate to unsigned long")
    > Signed-off-by: Ji Li <j...@akamai.com>
    > Signed-off-by: Ke Li <k...@akamai.com>
    > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
    > ---
    >  net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
    >  net/core/sock.c   | 2 +-
    >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
    > 
    > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
    > index c5e2a1c5fd8d..43f20c14864c 100644
    > --- a/net/core/filter.c
    > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
    > @@ -4693,7 +4693,7 @@ static int _bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int 
level, int optname,
    >                           cmpxchg(&sk->sk_pacing_status,
    >                                   SK_PACING_NONE,
    >                                   SK_PACING_NEEDED);
    > -                 sk->sk_max_pacing_rate = (val == ~0U) ? ~0UL : val;
    > +                 sk->sk_max_pacing_rate = (val == ~0U) ? ~0UL : 
(unsigned int)val;

    Looks good, but please wrap this to 80 chars.

    >                   sk->sk_pacing_rate = min(sk->sk_pacing_rate,
    >                                            sk->sk_max_pacing_rate);
    >                   break;
    > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
    > index 4e8729357122..727ea1cc633c 100644
    > --- a/net/core/sock.c
    > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
    > @@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, 
int optname,
    >  
    >   case SO_MAX_PACING_RATE:
    >           {
    > -         unsigned long ulval = (val == ~0U) ? ~0UL : val;
    > +         unsigned long ulval = (val == ~0U) ? ~0UL : (unsigned int)val;
    >  
    >           if (sizeof(ulval) != sizeof(val) &&
    >               optlen >= sizeof(ulval) &&
    > 
    > base-commit: 0e8b8d6a2d85344d80dda5beadd98f5f86e8d3d3


Reply via email to