From: Greg Ungerer <g...@linux-m68k.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 9:52 AM > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for the quick response. > > > On 20/10/20 12:40 pm, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:14:04PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> Commit f166f890c8f0 ("[PATCH] net: ethernet: fec: Replace interrupt > >> driven MDIO with polled IO") breaks the FEC driver on at least one of > >> the ColdFire platforms (the 5208). Maybe others, that is all I have > >> tested on so far. > >> > >> Specifically the driver no longer finds any PHY devices when it > >> probes the MDIO bus at kernel start time. > >> > >> I have pinned the problem down to this one specific change in this commit: > >> > >>> @@ -2143,8 +2142,21 @@ static int fec_enet_mii_init(struct > platform_device *pdev) > >>> if (suppress_preamble) > >>> fep->phy_speed |= BIT(7); > >>> + /* Clear MMFR to avoid to generate MII event by writing MSCR. > >>> + * MII event generation condition: > >>> + * - writing MSCR: > >>> + * - mmfr[31:0]_not_zero & mscr[7:0]_is_zero & > >>> + * mscr_reg_data_in[7:0] != 0 > >>> + * - writing MMFR: > >>> + * - mscr[7:0]_not_zero > >>> + */ > >>> + writel(0, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_DATA); > >> > >> At least by removing this I get the old behavior back and everything > >> works as it did before. > >> > >> With that write of the FEC_MII_DATA register in place it seems that > >> subsequent MDIO operations return immediately (that is FEC_IEVENT is > >> set) - even though it is obvious the MDIO transaction has not completed > >> yet. > >> > >> Any ideas? > > > > Hi Greg > > > > This has come up before, but the discussion fizzled out without a > > final patch fixing the issue. NXP suggested this > > > > writel(0, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_DATA); > > > > Without it, some other FEC variants break because they do generate an > > interrupt at the wrong time causing all following MDIO transactions to > > fail. > > > > At the moment, we don't seem to have a clear understanding of the > > different FEC versions, and how their MDIO implementations vary. > > Based on Andy and Chris' comments is something like the attached patch what > we need?
Greg, imx28 platform also requires the flag. > > Regards > Greg >