On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 14:49, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > I hope Andrew is fine with the current changes > > Yes, i'm O.K. with it.
Thanks > Making phy-mode optional would just make the > driver more uniform with others. > Making phy-mode optional is fine with me, but I think it would belong in a separate patch in any case. But I'd still prefer having the possibility to spot bogus phy-mode values rather than ignoring them.
