> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:02:38AM +0800, zhudi wrote: > > "ip addr show" command execute error when we have a physical network > > card with number of VFs larger than 247. > > > > The return value of if_nlmsg_size() in rtnl_calcit() will exceed range > > of u16 data type when any network cards has a larger number of VFs. > > rtnl_vfinfo_size() will significant increase needed dump size when the > > value of num_vfs is larger. > > > > Eventually we get a wrong value of min_ifinfo_dump_size because of > > overflow which decides the memory size needed by netlink dump and > > netlink_dump() will return -EMSGSIZE because of not enough memory was > allocated. > > > > So fix it by promoting min_dump_alloc data type to u32 to avoid data > > overflow and it's also align with the data type of struct > > netlink_callback{}.min_dump_alloc which is assigned by return value of > > rtnl_calcit() > > Unfortunately this is only part of the problem. For a NIC with so many VFs > (not sure if exactly 247 but it's close to that), IFLA_VFINFO_LIST nested > attribute itself would be over 64KB long which is not possible as attribute > size > is u16. > > So we should rather fail in such case (except when IFLA_VFINFO_LIST itself > fits into 64KB but the whole netlink message would not) and provide an > alternative way to get information about all VFs.
Thanks for your replying, it's right. The patch only fix the situation that IFLA_VFINFO_LIST itself fits into 64KB but the whole netlink message would not.