On 12.10.20 10:30, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 10/12/20 10:11 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:


On 12.10.20 10:05, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 10/12/20 9:43 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
As pointed out by Jakub Kicinski here:
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201009175751.5c540...@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com
this patch addresses the remarked issues:

- remove empty line in comment
- remove default=y for CAN_ISOTP in Kconfig
- make use of pr_notice_once()
- use GFP_ATOMIC instead of gfp_any() in soft hrtimer context

The version strings in the CAN subsystem are removed by a separate patch.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socket...@hartkopp.net>
---

Added both to linux-can-next.

The patches were intended for 'net-next' as the merge window will open
*very* soon.

I'm not sure if there would be another pull from linux-can-next until
then, therefore I would suggest that Jakub takes the patches himself.

I don't mind. FWIW, here's the pull request:

     http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012082727.2338859-1-...@pengutronix.de

     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git 
tags/linux-can-next-for-5.10-20201012

Marc

:-D

Well thanks!

I just got the feeling that especially the
"remove default=y for CAN_ISOTP in Kconfig"
issue is urgent in net-next.

So now any way to get the patches is fine.

Thanks & BR,
Oliver

Reply via email to