On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 06:13:11PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> If riov and wiov are both defined and they point to different
> objects, only riov is initialized. If the wiov is not initialized
> by the caller, the function fails returning -EINVAL and printing
> "Readable desc 0x... after writable" error message.
>
> Let's replace the 'else if' clause with 'if' to initialize both
> riov and wiov if they are not NULL.
>
> As checkpatch pointed out, we also avoid crashing the kernel
> when riov and wiov are both NULL, replacing BUG() with WARN_ON()
> and returning -EINVAL.
>
> Fixes: f87d0fbb5798 ("vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings.")
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
Can you add more detail please? when does this trigger?
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> index e059a9a47cdf..8bd8b403f087 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> @@ -284,13 +284,14 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> desc_max = vrh->vring.num;
> up_next = -1;
>
> + /* You must want something! */
> + if (WARN_ON(!riov && !wiov))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (riov)
> riov->i = riov->used = 0;
> - else if (wiov)
> + if (wiov)
> wiov->i = wiov->used = 0;
> - else
> - /* You must want something! */
> - BUG();
>
> for (;;) {
> void *addr;
> --
> 2.26.2
