Le 30/07/2020 à 07:41, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> From: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>
> 
> Similar to ip6_vti, IP6IP6 and IP6IP tunnels processing can easily
> be done with .cb_handler for xfrm interface.
> 
> v1->v2:
>   - no change.
> v2-v3:
>   - enable it only when CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL is defined, to fix
>     the build error, reported by kbuild test robot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>
> ---

This patch broke standard IP tunnels. With this setup:
+ ip link set ntfp2 up
+ ip addr add 10.125.0.2/24 dev ntfp2
+ ip tunnel add tun1 mode ipip ttl 64 local 10.125.0.2 remote 10.125.0.1 dev 
ntfp2
+ ip addr add 192.168.0.2/32 peer 192.168.0.1/32 dev tun1
+ ip link set dev tun1 up

incoming packets are dropped:
$ cat /proc/net/xfrm_stat
...
XfrmInNoStates                  31
...

Xin, can you have a look?

>  net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> index c407ecbc5d46..b9ef496d3d7c 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> @@ -798,6 +798,26 @@ static struct xfrm6_protocol xfrmi_ipcomp6_protocol 
> __read_mostly = {
>       .priority       =       10,
>  };
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL)
> +static int xfrmi6_rcv_tunnel(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +     const xfrm_address_t *saddr;
> +     __be32 spi;
> +
> +     saddr = (const xfrm_address_t *)&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr;
> +     spi = xfrm6_tunnel_spi_lookup(dev_net(skb->dev), saddr);
> +
> +     return xfrm6_rcv_spi(skb, IPPROTO_IPV6, spi, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static struct xfrm6_tunnel xfrmi_ipv6_handler __read_mostly = {
> +     .handler        =       xfrmi6_rcv_tunnel,
> +     .cb_handler     =       xfrmi_rcv_cb,
> +     .err_handler    =       xfrmi6_err,
> +     .priority       =       -1,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct xfrm4_protocol xfrmi_esp4_protocol __read_mostly = {
>       .handler        =       xfrm4_rcv,
>       .input_handler  =       xfrm_input,
> @@ -866,9 +886,23 @@ static int __init xfrmi6_init(void)
>       err = xfrm6_protocol_register(&xfrmi_ipcomp6_protocol, IPPROTO_COMP);
>       if (err < 0)
>               goto xfrm_proto_comp_failed;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL)
> +     err = xfrm6_tunnel_register(&xfrmi_ipv6_handler, AF_INET6);
> +     if (err < 0)
> +             goto xfrm_tunnel_ipv6_failed;
> +     err = xfrm6_tunnel_register(&xfrmi_ipv6_handler, AF_INET);
> +     if (err < 0)
> +             goto xfrm_tunnel_ip6ip_failed;
> +#endif
>  
>       return 0;
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL)
> +xfrm_tunnel_ip6ip_failed:
> +     xfrm6_tunnel_deregister(&xfrmi_ipv6_handler, AF_INET6);
> +xfrm_tunnel_ipv6_failed:
> +     xfrm6_protocol_deregister(&xfrmi_ipcomp6_protocol, IPPROTO_COMP);
> +#endif
>  xfrm_proto_comp_failed:
>       xfrm6_protocol_deregister(&xfrmi_ah6_protocol, IPPROTO_AH);
>  xfrm_proto_ah_failed:
> @@ -879,6 +913,10 @@ static int __init xfrmi6_init(void)
>  
>  static void xfrmi6_fini(void)
>  {
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL)
> +     xfrm6_tunnel_deregister(&xfrmi_ipv6_handler, AF_INET);
> +     xfrm6_tunnel_deregister(&xfrmi_ipv6_handler, AF_INET6);
> +#endif
>       xfrm6_protocol_deregister(&xfrmi_ipcomp6_protocol, IPPROTO_COMP);
>       xfrm6_protocol_deregister(&xfrmi_ah6_protocol, IPPROTO_AH);
>       xfrm6_protocol_deregister(&xfrmi_esp6_protocol, IPPROTO_ESP);
> 

Reply via email to