On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 12:14 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Hm. I guess you could even have both? > > > > struct genl_ops *ops; > > struct genl_ops_ext *extops; > > > > and then search both arrays, no need for memcpy/pointer assignment? > > Yup, both should work quite nicely, too. No reason to force one or the > other.
Indeed. > Extra n_ops_ext should be fine, I think I can make n_ops a u8 in > the first place, since commands themselves are u8s. And 0 is commonly > unused. True. I'm not really worried about the extra pointer in the *family* though, there aren't really all that many families :) johannes
