On Fri 25 Sep 2020 at 22:22, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:24 AM Vlad Buslov <v...@buslov.dev> wrote:
>> > + if (TC_ACT_EXT_CMP(a->tcfa_action, TC_ACT_GOTO_CHAIN) &&
>> > + !rcu_access_pointer(a->goto_chain)) {
>> > + tcf_action_destroy_1(a, bind);
>> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "can't use goto chain with NULL
>> > chain");
>> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> > + }
>>
>> I don't think calling tcf_action_destoy_1() is enough here. Since you
>> moved this block before assigning cookie and releasing the module, you
>> also need to release them manually in addition to destroying the action
>> instance.
>>
>
> tcf_action_destoy_1() eventually calls free_tcf() which frees cookie and
> tcf_action_destroy() which releases module refcnt.
>
> What am I missing here?
>
> Thanks.
The memory referenced by the function local pointer "cookie" hasn't been
assigned yet to the a->act_cookie because in your patch you moved
goto_chain validation code before the cookie change. That means that if
user overwrites existing action, then action old a->act_cookie will be
freed by tcf_action_destroy_1() but new cookie that was allocated by
nla_memdup_cookie() will leak.
Regards,
Vlad
