On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:37:24PM +0800, Coly Li wrote: > Hi David and Christoph, > > It has been quiet for a while, what should we go next for the > kernel_sendpage() related issue ? > > Will Christoph's or my series be considered as proper fix, or maybe I > should wait for some other better idea to show up? Any is OK for me, > once the problem is fixed.
I think for all the network storage stuff we really need a "send me out a page helper", and the nvmet bits that Dave pointed to look to me like they actually are currently broken. Given that Dave doesn't want to change the kernel_sendpage semantics I'll resend with a new helper instead. Any preferences for a name? safe_sendpage? kernel_sendpage_safe? kernel_send_one_page?
