On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 22:11 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Thats why I suggested that we should create one, ideally before adding > more sysfs/proc/ioctl/... based interfaces, which we'll have a hard time > getting rid of again.
But then how would we configure initial parameters along with creating the interface? That's something that's good to have, and I don't see how you can allow it generically. Then again, you can of course always add an interface and then change its operating parameters etc. but that isn't atomic any more. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
