From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.go...@intel.com>
The previous timestamping latency numbers were obtained by
interpolating the i210 numbers with the i225 crystal clock value. That
calculation was wrong.
Use the correct values from real measurements.
Fixes: 81b055205e8b ("igc: Add support for RX timestamping")
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.go...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.br...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.ngu...@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
index 3070dfdb7eb4..2d566f3c827b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
@@ -299,18 +299,14 @@ extern char igc_driver_name[];
#define IGC_RX_HDR_LEN IGC_RXBUFFER_256
/* Transmit and receive latency (for PTP timestamps) */
-/* FIXME: These values were estimated using the ones that i225 has as
- * basis, they seem to provide good numbers with ptp4l/phc2sys, but we
- * need to confirm them.
- */
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_10 9542
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_100 1024
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_1000 178
-#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_2500 64
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_10 20662
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_100 2213
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_1000 448
-#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_2500 160
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_10 240
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_100 58
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_1000 80
+#define IGC_I225_TX_LATENCY_2500 1325
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_10 6450
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_100 185
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_1000 300
+#define IGC_I225_RX_LATENCY_2500 1485
/* RX and TX descriptor control thresholds.
* PTHRESH - MAC will consider prefetch if it has fewer than this number of
--
2.26.2
