On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:21:50PM -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:36 PM Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:15:52PM -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> > > This patch series reorganizes TCP congestion control initialization so
> > > that if
> > > EBPF code called by tcp_init_transfer() sets the congestion control
> > > algorithm
> > > by calling setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION) then the TCP stack initializes the
> > > congestion control module immediately, instead of having
> > > tcp_init_transfer()
> > > later initialize the congestion control module.
> > >
> > > This increases flexibility for the EBPF code that runs at connection
> > > establishment time, and simplifies the code.
> > >
> > > This has the following benefits:
> > >
> > > (1) This allows CC module customizations made by the EBPF called in
> > > tcp_init_transfer() to persist, and not be wiped out by a later
> > > call to tcp_init_congestion_control() in tcp_init_transfer().
> > >
> > > (2) Does not flip the order of EBPF and CC init, to avoid causing bugs
> > > for existing code upstream that depends on the current order.
> > >
> > > (3) Does not cause 2 initializations for for CC in the case where the
> > > EBPF called in tcp_init_transfer() wants to set the CC to a new CC
> > > algorithm.
> > >
> > > (4) Allows follow-on simplifications to the code in net/core/filter.c
> > > and net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c, which currently both have some complexity
> > > to special-case CC initialization to avoid double CC
> > > initialization if EBPF sets the CC.
> > Thanks for this work. Only have one nit in patch 3 for consideration.
> >
> > Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
>
> Thanks for the review! I like your suggestion in patch 3 to further
> simplify the code. Do you mind submitting your idea for a follow-on
> clean-up/refactor as a separate follow-on commit?
Sure. will do.
