On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:15:06PM +0530, Allen Pais wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the
> struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
> callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
> and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.per...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.l...@gmail.com>
The correct prefix for NFP driver patches is "nfp: ", not
"ethernet: netronome: ". Possibly a similar comment applies to other
patches in this series.
Patches targeted at "net-next" should include "net-next" in the subject,
like this: [PATCH v2 net-next 16/20] ...
The patch itself seems fine to me.
So with the above fixed feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
> index 21ea22694e47..b150da43adb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
> @@ -2287,9 +2287,9 @@ static bool nfp_ctrl_rx(struct nfp_net_r_vector *r_vec)
> return budget;
> }
>
> -static void nfp_ctrl_poll(unsigned long arg)
> +static void nfp_ctrl_poll(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> {
> - struct nfp_net_r_vector *r_vec = (void *)arg;
> + struct nfp_net_r_vector *r_vec = from_tasklet(r_vec, t, tasklet);
>
> spin_lock(&r_vec->lock);
> nfp_net_tx_complete(r_vec->tx_ring, 0);
> @@ -2337,8 +2337,7 @@ static void nfp_net_vecs_init(struct nfp_net *nn)
>
> __skb_queue_head_init(&r_vec->queue);
> spin_lock_init(&r_vec->lock);
> - tasklet_init(&r_vec->tasklet, nfp_ctrl_poll,
> - (unsigned long)r_vec);
> + tasklet_setup(&r_vec->tasklet, nfp_ctrl_poll);
> tasklet_disable(&r_vec->tasklet);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
