On 9/6/20 11:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 04:05:48PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> There's a trivial io_uring patch that depends on this one. If this one >> is acceptable to you, I'd like to queue it up in the io_uring branch for >> 5.10. > > Can you give it a better name? These __ names re just horrible. > sock_shutdown_sock?
Sure, I don't really care, just following what is mostly done already. And it is meant to be internal in the sense that it's not exported to modules. I'll let the net guys pass the final judgement on that, I'm obviously fine with anything in terms of naming :-) -- Jens Axboe
