On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:01 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > Can you test the attached one-line fix? I think we are overthinking, > probably all > we need here is a busy wait.
I think that will solve, but I also think that will kill NOLOCK performances due to really increased contention. At this point I fear we could consider reverting the NOLOCK stuff. I personally would hate doing so, but it looks like NOLOCK benefits are outweighed by its issues. Any other opinion more than welcome! Cheers, Paolo
