On 8/31/20 5:16 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:50:54 -0700
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:35:55 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
index 9e2ac2b8a082..2b2eb5f2a0e5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#define IONIC_DEF_TXRX_DESC 4096
#define IONIC_LIFS_MAX 1024
#define IONIC_WATCHDOG_SECS 5
-#define IONIC_ITR_COAL_USEC_DEFAULT 64
+#define IONIC_ITR_COAL_USEC_DEFAULT 8
8 us interrupt coalescing does not hurt general operations?! No way.
It's your customers who'll get hurt here, so your call, but I seriously
doubt this. Unless the unit is not usec?
Agreed, 8usec is really really low. You won't get much coalescing during
bulk transfers with a value like that, eliminating the gain from coalescing
in the first place.
Thanks. I'll drop this patch and come back to this issue when we get a
chance to add adaptive coalescing.
sln
